Enter your email address for weekly access to top multifamily blogs!

Multifamily Blogs

This is some blog description about this site

JC Penney Proves It’s Hard to Change Pricing Psychology

JC Penney Proves It’s Hard to Change Pricing Psychology

Don’t know how many of you follow retail, but JC Penney just pulled the plug on one of the biggest experiments in pricing history—acknowledging it to be a colossal failure. In short, Ron Johnson, the architect of a move from constant couponing to simple “fair” pricing is out. And expect coupons to be back in.

I was skeptical when he was hired and announced his plans less than 2 years ago on two grounds:  1) Walmart kind of owns the “every day low price” model (plus it’s not clear that “everyday fair pricing” has an authentic ring to it anyway) and 2) more often than not, I find people like to feel they’re getting a deal. In other words, discounting sends a psychological signal that is more powerful than “simple” pricing.

How is this relevant to multi-family housing, you may ask? I’ve been amused that implementation of revenue management systems like LRO and YieldStar have been accompanied by a belief that they make us get rid of concessions—and that this is a good thing. Both systems allow folks to use concessions—they calculate the recommended effective rent and then mark up the asking rent accordingly. Except for ultra-luxury product (where no discounting signals quality), discounts (which is what we should call concessions) are a great tool for conveying value. JC Penney should have realized it and is now paying the price (note: JC Penney was already struggling, so it’s no guarantee that they wouldn’t have ultimately failed chasing the old way but I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t have sales down 32% fourth quarter).

Discounts and coupons may be gimmicky, but they keep people coming through the store—my wife loves Kohl’s; aside from various timed discounts, Kohl’s gives every customer Kohl’s cash which is a coupon for a percentage of each sale with the catch that it’s only good for a week from the sale date—i.e. you have to come back into the store in 1-2 weeks to use it.

Anyway, they’ll be writing case studies and post mortems on this for a long while. In the meantime, here’s my favorite comment post from someone named Bruce who read the article in the link above:

This whole episode was WHACKO on the part of JCP. People would rather be "fooled" into thinking they're getting a better deal in a "sale", than to think they are getting a "low, regular price". Chalk it up the the (sic) incredible naiveté of the American shopper!

Come save 50% on the prices we just marked up 50%!!!

I agree with him that people do often prefer a “sale” to a “low, regular price.” And I got a chuckle at him proving at least his own math incompetence, if not actual naiveté. Hopefully by the time you read this sentence, you’ve figured out that 50% off a 50% marked up price would still be a 25% discount. Numeracy is an issue—even with people who look down on the general public and it’s general lack of numeracy :)

 
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

I think people are stubbornly attached to using coupons. Let me tell you that last weekend I went "shopping" and this is what I found. I chose Jones Wear to price compare. I went to a Dress Barn (not really high end) and to JCP. I found a sleeveless suitblouse (the only thing I liked at Dress Barn) and it was priced at $35. I could get the SAME thing at JCP for - get this $16. Sixteen dollars every day, all day, no sale needed. I did like JCP's pricing strategy and liked it from the very beginning. Fair pricing is what people need - for all products. When I decide to go shopping it's because I need the item, not so much because I am frivolously spending my time, energy and money (even though I love to shop.) I see on properties now Leasing Consultants who cannot sell value but rely all day long, every day, on concessions. It's maddening. But that is what we teach people to ask for when they come to our communities. Negotiate a deal or go elsewhere. Am I the only one who thinks this?

  Mindy Sharp
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

JC Penney's same-store sales were down 32% on the prior year in 4th quarter 2013. So it would appear that something was wrong with their pricing and/or product mix. As for concessions, why do we call them concessions when everyone else in business calls them discounts? If you're on an automated revenue management system (LRO or Yieldstar), then the system will calculate the appropriate effective rent. If consumers want to feel like they're getting a deal, why not let them feel that way? The "concession" (aka discount) just takes the effective rent from the RM system and marks up an appropriate asking rent. They're not maddening anymore then--just a tactic on top of the optimal effective rent.

  Donald Davidoff
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

I think one of the big challenges is to isolate the causes and effects. Was it their pricing, their product selection, their battle with conservative groups, a mix of some, or all of the above? With so many changes, do we know for certain one element had either a positive or negative effect?

  Brent Williams
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Of course we can't know anything for sure. But the Board surely didn't think Johnson had them going anywhere in the right direction. The article I linked to cited other issues as well (product mix and technology challenges). I think it's interesting, though that what people say they want in pricing isn't always what they respond to. So we say we want simple, fair pricing, yet more people respond to coupons and promotions. We say we don't want to be nickle and dimed on baggage fees, etc. but the general public buys the cheapest fare (note that the major airlines waive these extra fees for regular business travelers who are more likely to think total cost). Daniel Ariely,in his book "Predictably Irrational" shows many examples of such "madness"--yet it's not madness; it's human nature.

@Mindy. Of course paying $16 is better than paying $35, but that's not really the point. With all the discounting and couponing, the actual price is often not transparent. If you take the time to shop multiple stores, you find the deal. But there's a cost to that--gas, time, emotional toll, etc. And if JCP is cutting prices that low, that may be part of what caused their sales to go down. Your volume has to go up more than double if you're selling things at $16 that someone else is selling at $35.

  Donald Davidoff
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

For me, paying $16 is always better than paying $35. I understand all about revenue management and the tools we use to price rental rates. In my opinion, which apparently is not shared with anyone other than JCP 's former CEO, as far as retail goes, I don't want to have to wait for a sale or a coupon or a friends and family promo. But this is a fun topic!

  Mindy Sharp
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

I've shopped at JcPenney and I can tell you that in our local store the rhetoric did not match the reality. The store was updated, certainly looked cleaner and sleeker, had signs telling you that you could get Wi-Fi, but the people they had didn't match the image they tried to portray. On a couple of occasions I couldn't tell a sales associate from a customer from a stock person, without seeing a name tag! And even then I wasn't sure if I got a bonafide sales associate, or someone filling in. I was do disappointed in the service I received that I wrote to JCP and was then disappointed in the speed and quality of the response!

  Rommel Anacan
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

If bargain shopping is in your blood then trust me the only person who is being fooled are the ones who though they could hike up the prices without you knowing.

  JACQUE

Comment Below

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location

Recent Blogs