The "renewal incentives" thread makes me uncomfortable because it seems to miss the criticial point and thus, seems to be mislabeled. I would, instead, shift our focus from "renewal incentives" to "customer retention" or, to put another way, "customer satisfaction".
The theory behind "renewal incentives" seems to be that a community can offer some kind of carrots that will cause a customer to make a decision to stay in their apartment. These carrot ideas vary widely in scope, including things like free carpet shampooing, free coffee, ice cream scoops with community logos, goodie bags, new painting, community events, etc. "Renewal incentives", i.e., all of these carrot ideas could be better be labeled as "Public Relations", but don't fit the psychology of customer retention/satisfaction.
Realistically, there are forces at work that lead customers to decide to move that a property has no control over, such as job transfer, family issues, etc. On the other hand, moving from one home to another is not easy, the costs of moving are not just financial and also include lost work time and mundane disruptions such as a new address or changing of paid services. The level of mobility may also have some relationship to income or region of the country and thus, certain properties could be more at risk for mobility than others. In our case, Syracuse has experienced negative population growth, negative job growth, and certainly being the snowiest big city in North America doesn't help either. And, we have an aging property of 44+ years.
First, we should acknowledge that customer retention/satisfaction begins from the initial encounters, with the clock starting with the move-in experience and continuing through the next twelve months. Then, what was the quality of the "apartment prep"? Quality can be affected by the age of the property or its original construction approach, but some properties will compress their apartment prep turnover process into a very short time period. A poor quality turnover results in future service requests, which even if performed to perfection, are annoyances to customers, and will have a drain on overall customer satisfaction. Poor quality begets poor quality, which leads to shorter stays, which leads to more customer turnover.
Second, Public Relations efforts (i.e., "renewal incentives") are nice, but cannot substitute for a "good" experience. A "good" experience can be affected by things such as issues with neighbors, a poorly prepared apartment, or simply poor service. The problem with PR efforts is that they make management feel like it is addressing customer retention/satisfaction, when it fact, the bigger picture of "good" experiences is what needs to be the primary focus.
The most important amenity is customer service. We want to provide "Anything, Anytime" service, which includes changing a light bulb on Christmas Day. We don't always succeed, but improving service is where are efforts are directed. "Renewal incentives" are more of a placebo, but realistically cannot substitute for a "good" experience.
Sadly, a few weeks ago, and almost timed together, we lost two customers who moved: one had been with us for 39 years, the other for 38 years. There were times that with both sets of customers we failed in our expectations for service. And, like a lot of relationships, it was not always blissful, but overall, we played an important role in their lives and we appreciate the opportunity they gave us.
Rick Hevier
Richard Hevier
Rick S. Hevier
[email protected]