I am guessing that there is no way to track this, but I thought I would throw it out there, and also see what you all think about using printed newsletters. On the one hand, they seem so outdated, but on the other, I think there are still some strong arguments for using printed newsletters. For example, they absolutely have to be handled longer than 1 second, at least to be put in the trash, if anything. Compare that to email newsletters, where they can be deleted without opened with a simple click. Second, if you look at it as a percent of the total distribution medium, it is incredibly high. People might get a couple of menus or coupons placed on their door over the course of the week, so on any given day, a printed newsletter is probably 50-100% of that distribution medium, which means basically no competition. Compare that to email, where a newsletter is just one of a multitude of items the resident has to sift through. It reminds me of someone several years ago who said that fax marketing was still really effective for him, well after faxes became essentially obsolete. The thinking was that even though people generally didn't use them anymore, that actually helped because it meant his fax was the only one sitting there, and would almost guarantee it was read.
On the flip side, printed newsletters are much more expensive than email newsletters, both in printing cost and distribution cost, and maybe my assumption that they are read more often is completely wrong.
What do you all think - do newsletters get higher readership because the competition is lower for the resident's attention? And if so, could it still be a good way to engage residents?
UPDATE: I've been thinking more about this in relation to how this is an "old fashioned" medium, and whether that automatically disqualifies it... When we think about younger generations and their use of media, we are talking about how they seek out information. But this is different in that the media sought out the resident. The media is already in their hands, literally. So even if they are tied to their smart phone, does that preclude them from reading the paper in their hand? I don't know, but I thought I would add this thought.